Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 474 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.

Tennis Arena

Helium9 Games

Join Tennis Arena Now!

4.4 ★85,953 ratings
10M+Downloads
4+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

Join Tennis Arena Now!

Play Tie Break Tens official tournaments in Tennis Arena — an exciting free modern tennis game, featuring online PvP competitions, fast action, and a large choice of tennis players and stadiums. Tennis Arena is the place where fans of sports games from all over the world clash in league and tournament tennis matches.

Do you prefer to serve and volley or stick to the baseline and smash powerful forehands? Whatever your style, hit tennis courts and enjoy tactical tennis gameplay while honing your sport skills. Clash with other players, play in diverse locations of our tennis game tournaments, climb leaderboards, and become an ultimate tennis champion!

Features: 🎉 A brand new action tennis game. 🎾 Realistic 3D tennis play with true motion ball and shot physics. 📱 Full support for both portrait and landscape screen orientation.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Tennis Arena screenshot 1
Tennis Arena screenshot 2
Tennis Arena screenshot 3
Tennis Arena screenshot 4
Tennis Arena screenshot 5
Tennis Arena screenshot 6
Tennis Arena screenshot 7
Tennis Arena screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

This analysis describes version 16.3.5 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 16.3.5, updated 2026-09-09.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 16.3.5, scanned 2026-09-28.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
None requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact fe8c0fa2cae9…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

In the app's own text: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact fe8c0fa2cae9…
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.7% of 474 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (1.1% of 474 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Pay to progress
“Good bussiness model, bad overall game. I play because of somewhat "realistic" game mechanics. But overall the game is pay to win. I am level 10 and I am well past the highest league of the game, my opponents are all level 16+ with unfair…”
3★ · Google Play · 2026-06-08
Pay to progress
“Just like the other Helium developer tennis game Roaring 20's. They set the AI player level low at the beginning to grant you success and lure you in then you hit a wall that you cannot beat the sudden perfect AI players without paying…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-07
Pay to progress
“In it's essence it's just another pay-to-win experience. Decent for a while, but by Champions I it's completely unplayable For f2p player.”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-03-30

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 16.3.5.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.