Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 418 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.8 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.8, updated 2026-09-16.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Automate your systems, optimize production, and upgrade technology to deal massive damage to the black hole.
Build and Upgrade
Set up and expand your base one structure at a time.
- Mission Control
- Drone Hub
- Rocket Hub
- Kinetic Striker
- Asteroid Drill
- Laser Array
- Solar Mirror
- Antimatter Reactor
Recruit and Command
Assemble a legendary crew of commanders and managers through the gacha system. Each brings unique skills and bonuses that push your operation to new heights.
Explore and Expand
Embark on galactic explorations to gather rare crafting materials, discover lost technologies, and forge powerful equipment to enhance your production and damage output.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 5 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), Meta Audience Network and 1 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:2e92853430502658f9df575ac959e6b0bfb0a763ad9ddeaf9d1580275813a27bOpen observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 60 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:2e92853430502658f9df575ac959e6b0bfb0a763ad9ddeaf9d1580275813a27bThe app's own text says: "Please press "Continue" if you choose to start using our app."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:2e92853430502658f9df575ac959e6b0bfb0a763ad9ddeaf9d1580275813a27bThe app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:2e92853430502658f9df575ac959e6b0bfb0a763ad9ddeaf9d1580275813a27b418 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I LOVED the game. It's the first game I downloaded when I bought this phone and have played it to this day. sure, it's slow, especially after reaching prestige, but I'd still check it every other day or so. it's before they added that…
was good until recent update where you now see unskippable ad to "earn real money while you play". pretty sure it ain't right to do so...
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.8, scanned 22 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.8 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.8, updated 2026-09-16.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Added Freecash: earn money while playing
No release notes were provided for this version.
the-space-clickerAssessed 2026-10-30 from 418 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.