Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 402 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.

TIMEFLIK Watch Faces

TIMEFLIK

The best smartwatch watch face marketplace with over 2 million watch faces, t…

3.9 ★68,651 ratings
10M+Downloads
4+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

The best smartwatch watch face marketplace with over 2 million watch faces, the most in the world.

Galaxy Watch 7, 8 Series and All Wear OS 6+ devices Official Support! If you’re using a smartwatch with Wear OS 6, please go to My Page > Settings to switch to the new version.

INSTALL OUR WATCH APP!!! Set TIMEFLIK watch app in your watch screen to send watch faces properly.

⌚︎ Full Watch Face Format Support Offers customizable features and improved battery-efficient WFF(Watch Face Format) designs.😎

⌚︎ One-Tap Application Change watch faces instantly with one button, no need for a clunky companion app.

⌚︎ Top Designers Discover stunning designs by over 50 professional designers.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
TIMEFLIK Watch Faces screenshot 1
TIMEFLIK Watch Faces screenshot 2
TIMEFLIK Watch Faces screenshot 3
TIMEFLIK Watch Faces screenshot 4
TIMEFLIK Watch Faces screenshot 5
TIMEFLIK Watch Faces screenshot 6
TIMEFLIK Watch Faces screenshot 7
TIMEFLIK Watch Faces screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

This analysis describes version 10.5.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version VARY, updated 2026-10-01.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 10.5.3, scanned 2026-10-03.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
3–5 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
3–9 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact dfad2c92d665…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 4 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), Tapjoy

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

In the app's own text: Countdown-timer purchase pressure
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact dfad2c92d665…
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
What we saw: Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "The early subscriber discount ends in December, so it will be paid regularly at the increased rate. Please agree to price increase on [Google Play Store > Subscriptions] to maintain the subscriptio…
Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 30 distinct reviewers (7.5% of 402 reviews scanned)
In the app's own text: Trial terms not stated in the app's own text
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact dfad2c92d665…
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
What we saw: Offers a free trial ("Start a Free Trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Aggressive ad load
“Takes a while to load and now they added lots of adds. I don't want to watch a minute long ad to check the list of available watch faces (that you have to pay for). It had some cute faces but not worth it anymore.”
1★ · Google Play · 2024-05-07
Aggressive ad load
“The app used to be good. You played a ad to load the face you wanted. Fine. Then it changed to getting an ad after just viewing 3-4 faces. Annoying but still usable. Now you get ads every 30 seconds, all the time. It's total garbage now.”
1★ · Google Play · 2024-09-06
Aggressive ad load
“Have been using this app for years and I did love it! Now, there's an ad every 5 seconds and I can't be bothered to sit through them all just to look at watch faces. Uninstalled 👎”
2★ · Google Play · 2024-08-18

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version VARY.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.