Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 3 signal sources · 934 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.

Tokyo Debunker

ZigZaGame Inc.

Handsome ghouls & quirky cats

4.7 ★88,174 ratings
1M+Downloads
12+Age rating
224 MBApp size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

Solve supernatural cases in Tokyo alongside devilishly handsome ghouls and quirky cat familiars!

At the prestigious Darkwick Academy, your unruly classmates have sold their souls to demons in exchange for a wish… and you’ll have to find a way to make them work together to solve supernatural cases all over Tokyo. If you get stuck, you can always turn to Darkwick’s clever cat familiars for their support!

Enjoy a wide variety of gameplay modes! -Explore a gripping story through comics and Live 2D -Build new facilities with your adorable cat familiars -Collect cute and quirky cats -Battle monsters with your ghoul classmates -Play rhythm games to collect powerful items -Join other players in exciting co-op modes

Your time with us is what you make it… Welcome to the bizarre charms of Tokyo’s dark side.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Tokyo Debunker screenshot 1
Tokyo Debunker screenshot 2
Tokyo Debunker screenshot 3
Tokyo Debunker screenshot 4
Tokyo Debunker screenshot 5
Tokyo Debunker screenshot 6
Tokyo Debunker screenshot 7
Tokyo Debunker screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

Evidence and review signals

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated analysis in progress

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 1.6.21 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.6.21, updated 2026-09-14.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 1.6.21 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.6.21, updated 2026-09-10.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence about the app, not a finding about it.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Reported by 99 usersReported by users, not measured — nothing we can inspect could show this either wayview evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Raised by 99 distinct reviewers — 19.8% of the 500 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).

Context 1

Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.

Cheapest and priciest options are far apart
MeasuredPublished as context — deliberately not a charge · from the store listingview evidence
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
What we saw: In-app purchases run from USD 1.19 to USD 117.99 — a 99x spread across 10 items

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 434 reviews scanned)
From the store listing: Usable without an account
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the store privacy disclosure.view evidence
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
What we saw: The store privacy disclosure (7 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
“It's a pretty fun game, but so far absolutely nothing like the ads (which is pretty much true for all mobile games these days). I was expecting some type of mystery game, but it's more like a character collection/base building game like…”
5★ · Google Play · 2026-02-02
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
“Love this game! The story is really captivating to me, and I love that its a female protag, and not a male. The real issue is its majorly p2w. To progress the story, you need to win cases; to win cases, you need strong cards; to get…”
3★ · Google Play · 2026-03-08
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
“There's not much to do, you collect money and daily rewards then log off. It's difficult to get any good cards or materials without paying a lot. I don't want an otome game I rather watch the characters interact with each other while…”
3★ · Google Play · 2026-02-24

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 1.6.21.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown10
Lowest$1.19
Highest$117.99
Pack 9$9.99
Pack 2$1.59
Pack 13$21.99
Pack 1$1.19
Pack 7$6.49
Show 5 more purchases
Pack 16$41.99
Pack 4$3.69
Pack 18$99.99
Pack 12$17.99
Pack 20$117.99

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.