“Zero Respect for Our Time! Unfair, broken Gameplay! Insane Pay-to-Win and Favorite Playing, while the majority of the player base is expected to grind for months or literally years and drop hard-earned cash just to get essential gear…”
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 520 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.
4.3 ★156,934 ratings
10M+Downloads
17+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases
About this app
Tomorrow has come! Get ready to fight in a post apocalyptic wasteland where survival is an ongoing adventure. In Tomorrow: MMO Nuclear Quest, players are thrown into a post nuclear wasteland full of zombie, monsters, and hostile factions. Set in the 2060s, the open-world RPG allows you to complete different types of quests. You can craft essential items, defend against zombie who have managed to survive the apocalypse, and much more. Each quest tests your skills and forces you to adapt in this harsh post nuclear MMO wasteland.
⚒ Build your own shelter in a post nuclear environment! ⚒
With deep survival RPG elements, Tomorrow: MMO Nuclear Quest offers an adventure unlike any other. Explore the vast open world at your own pace, taking on quests that challenge your ability to craft items, build a base, and engage in intense PvP battle.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
The evidence behind this assessment
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
This analysis describes version 1.7.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.8, updated 2026-09-24.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
From the package we downloaded and read — version 1.7.1, scanned 2026-09-21.
Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
3–5 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
3–9 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Multiple ad networks bundled
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 5 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), ironSource / Unity LevelPlay and 1 more
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 16 distinct reviewers (3.1% of 520 reviews scanned)
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“Final Edit: Utterly trash updates every time. Don't waste your time ppl clearly p2w and unfair mechanics on PVP. A complete waste of potential. Once u reach lvl 40-50 and reach third map it'll be hell and worse on fourth.”
“Reached level 25 have only found 3 blue prints still have just a sword and crossbow. Cannot get passed the toxic lizards. took 4 months I stopped playing it's obvious you have to PAY TO PLAY in order to advance. Very disappointed!”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 1.8.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.