Appworthy
Google Play
Version 10.3.0 · 2026-06-26
No release notes were provided for this version.
Touch Screen Test
There are three color-related tests (purity, gradients and shades) and two to…
Microsys Com Ltd.Google Play rating4.4★4.8K ratings
PriceFreeListed price
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryUtilities
DeveloperMicrosys Com Ltd.
What we found
Full reportToo little checked to say Only 400 reviews read, too few to say.
Money
- Free to download.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 10.3.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 10.3.0, updated 2026-06-26.
Preview
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
About this app
There are three color-related tests (purity, gradients and shades) and two touch-related ones (single and multi-touch). The Display info button opens a page that contains data about the screen resolution, pixel density, aspect ratio and current brightness. Depending on your phone model, these tests can help you decide, for example, if the eye comfort mode must be enabled to prevent eye strain, if the brightness level requires some adjustment or find out if the touch sensitivity is still good all over the screen's surface. The color tests and Information require one tap for every page. Anyway, you can exit anytime from the current test with a double-tap somewhere on the screen. The Single-touch test is complete when the whole screen is filled with blue rectangles - including the area occupied by the upper text message.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The full report
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings and evidence
This assessment published no findings. That is a statement about what the evidence we had could show, not a clearance of the app.
What reviewers report
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
Measurements
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
From store data and reviews
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
No theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the app package we scanned
Android package 10.3.0, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Sensitive permissions
None requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
Versions and dates analysed
This analysis describes version 10.3.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 10.3.0, updated 2026-06-26.
Store update history
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Assessment record
- Status
- Automated analysis
- App identifier
touch-screen-test- Assessment date
- 24 Oct 2026
- Sources used
- 5 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing
- Reviews read
- 400
- Package examined
- Android · 10.3.0 · scanned 24 Oct 2026
- Human inspection
- Not completed
Assessed 2026-10-24 from 400 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
How we know
- Measurement vocabulary
- 1.4
How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-24 Version analyzed: 10.3.05 independent signals400 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing. Not yet checked: the store privacy disclosure.
Store facts
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
Google Play
- Store rating
- 4.37 ★ · 4,804 ratings
- Version
- 10.3.0
- Updated
- 26 Jun 2026
- Price
- Free
- Age rating
- 4+
- Size
- Not supplied
- Developer
- Microsys Com Ltd.
- Category
- Utilities
- Listing price
- Free
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
Method and limits
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Limits of this report
- A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
- Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
- Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
- A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Request a correction
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.