Language Translator – Translate 130+ Languages Instantly Communicate with co…
Novalt StudioSome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.6.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.7.0, updated 2026-10-20.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Language Translator – Translate 130+ Languages Instantly
Communicate with confidence anywhere in the world using Language Translator. Instantly translate text, voice, photos, conversations, and documents in over 130 languages. Whether you're traveling, studying, working, or chatting with friends, our fast and accurate translator helps you overcome language barriers with ease.
Text Translator
Translate words, sentences, and paragraphs instantly with accurate results. Copy, share, or listen to translations whenever you need them.
Voice Translator
Speak naturally and receive real-time voice translations. Perfect for conversations, travel, business meetings, and everyday communication.
Camera & Photo Translator
Point your camera at signs, menus, books, or documents and translate text in seconds using advanced OCR technology.
Conversation Translator…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 58 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 7 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "Lifetime Purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:f8fbdb7073da49e92668d8d29de14991041f0432200f11121240f1d9b2ffa01cThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Subscriptions are managed via your Google Play Billing and will renew automatically unless cancelled at least 24 hours before the current period ends. After purchase, you can manage your subscriptions in your Acco…
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:f8fbdb7073da49e92668d8d29de14991041f0432200f11121240f1d9b2ffa01cThe app's own text says: "Get Unlimited Access"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:f8fbdb7073da49e92668d8d29de14991041f0432200f11121240f1d9b2ffa01cPurchase screen steers the choice: "Best Offer"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:f8fbdb7073da49e92668d8d29de14991041f0432200f11121240f1d9b2ffa01cThe app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:f8fbdb7073da49e92668d8d29de14991041f0432200f11121240f1d9b2ffa01cThe app's own text says: "Link copied to clipboard"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:f8fbdb7073da49e92668d8d29de14991041f0432200f11121240f1d9b2ffa01c400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Opening the app displays an ad. selecting picture displays an ad. going back to the previous page also displays an ad. I understand that ads help support funds for developing an app, but this many is not necessary! Hi! Thank you for the…
actually it is very good but it have a lot of ads
usurping Google Translate icon to be downloaded, but it's a different app full of ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.6.9, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.6.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.7.0, updated 2026-10-20.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
translate-all-languages-nowAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.