Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 3 signal sources · 1,006 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-05.

Triple Match City

Breeze Games L.L.C-FZ

Hidden Object Matching Game!

4.7 ★151,286 ratings
5M+Downloads
4+Age rating
932 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

Triple Match City - The Ultimate Hidden Objects Adventure!

Are you ready to sharpen your observation skills and test your focus in an exciting and fast-paced hidden objects game? In Triple Match City, your mission is simple yet thrilling: find hidden objects across expansive maps and match them in sets of 3 before the time runs out! Immerse yourself in this captivating scavenger hunt challenge that will keep your brain engaged and your eyes sharp. Embark on a journey through beautifully designed maps filled with hundreds of hidden items waiting to be discovered. Every level brings a new challenge, with more intricate scenes, harder-to-find objects, and limited time to complete your goal. It’s a race against time—can you find all the objects before the clock runs out?…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Triple Match City screenshot 1
Triple Match City screenshot 2
Triple Match City screenshot 3
Triple Match City screenshot 4
Triple Match City screenshot 5
Triple Match City screenshot 6
Triple Match City screenshot 7
Triple Match City screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

Evidence and review signals

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated analysis in progress

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 3.0.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.0.4, updated 2026-09-16.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 3.0.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.1.1, updated 2026-09-30.

The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 3.0.4, not the version now listed on the store.

Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:

Version 3.1.1 · 2026-09-30

No release notes were provided for this version.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
3 or more themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence about the app, not a finding about it.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
Reported by 68 usersReported by users, not measured — nothing we can inspect could show this either wayview evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Raised by 68 distinct reviewers — 12.4% of the 548 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Progress pauses until you wait or pay
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Use is rationed by an energy/hearts/lives meter that runs out and forces a wait or a purchase.
What we saw: Energy / timer gating: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.3% of 548 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 12 distinct reviewers (2.2% of 548 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (2.0% of 548 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Aggressive ad load
“Game is good but some figures are too small for senior adults to recognize due to eyesight issues. Yes, even when the zoom is used on the tablet screen. It isn't fun when you can't finish a puzzle due to game control. Also, you should at…”
5★ · Google Play · 2026-04-21
Aggressive ad load
“Was a fun game until I made one purchase... Pretty disappointing that all optional ads disappear after you pay to remove the forced ads. If I had known, I wouldn’t have purchased the ads remover. Sometimes it is just too hard to get past…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-04-19
Aggressive ad load
“Today, adds after every game has ruined it. I've enjoyed this game so much because it was ad-free and uninterrupted. Now, it's between every game and those really annoying ones where you have to watch, wait, click to Google play, exit…”
2★ · Google Play · 2026-05-13

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 3.0.4.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.