Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 322 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.3.18 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.3.18, updated 2026-09-14.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Get ready for a fun truth or dare experience for parties, game nights, and gatherings with friends.
Whether you're looking for a party game to break the ice, a way to laugh with your friends, or a classic spin-the-wheel game with questions and challenges, this group game has everything you need for a memorable night.
Perfect for friends, families, couples, and groups, our truth or dare game brings simple, funny, and engaging challenges for every occasion.
With over 1,300 unique truth or dare challenges, you can explore a variety of categories designed to match different moods and groups. Start light with Party Starter or Family Night, perfect for keeping things friendly and fun. Want something more energetic? Try categories like Insane Party, Couples, Party Boost, and Friends Night.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:a010725a9d58642bf4301ffedeca69ad94fef37742f92940a0156eb3bc26146bAggressive ad load: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 40 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited-Time Offer"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
Package artefact
sha256:a010725a9d58642bf4301ffedeca69ad94fef37742f92940a0156eb3bc26146bThe app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:a010725a9d58642bf4301ffedeca69ad94fef37742f92940a0156eb3bc26146b322 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Nothing but ads and can't access most of the game without paying 1st. Pass. Actually paid for the game now, but it won't open now. Tried closing the app, still won't play.
even when you make an in app purchase you get a ridiculous amount of adds, and no way to request a refund. was on the app for not even 20mins before wanting to just delete it. 0 starts for sure.
horrible game hated it don't download if you dont want to waste your type suddenly freezes after few games and askes to swith to premium, too much Ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.3.18, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.3.18 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.3.18, updated 2026-09-14.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Minor bug fixes. Update now and start enjoying the game! We'd appreciate it if you could take a moment to rate and review, and have fun playing Truth or Dare!
No release notes were provided for this version.
truth-or-dare-party-gamesAssessed 2026-10-30 from 322 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.