Appworthy

Ultiself | Self-Improvement

Build Better Habits With Small Daily Changes If you want a simple way to org…

Ultiself
Get it onGoogle Play
Google Play rating4.2★8K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryHealth & Fitness
DeveloperUltiself

What we found

Full report

Some warnings 22 users report unexpected charges; 10 users report trouble cancelling. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 2.7.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .

The store currently lists version 2.7.0, updated 2026-10-22.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Build Better Habits With Small Daily Changes

If you want a simple way to organize your day, track your habits, and build routines you can actually follow, try Ultiself for free.

Ultiself is a user-friendly habit and routine app that helps you plan your day, set reminders, complete daily check-ins, and review your progress over time.

Choose habits from our library, create a routine that fits your lifestyle, and use simple insights to understand your patterns.

Just imagine:

* Logging the habits that matter to you

* Creating a routine that fits your day

* Staying focused on your personal goals

* Seeing your progress over time

* Building consistency one day at a time

Ultiself is your personal habit and routine companion.

3 simple steps to build your routine with Ultiself:…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

1 published · 2 shown, not confirmed

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Hard to cancel

One source only

Hard to cancel: raised by 10 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 40 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
2.5% of the 400 reviews read.

Reports of unexpected charges

One source only

Surprise charges: raised by 22 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 18 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
5.5% of the 400 reviews read.

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

400 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Hard to cancel

Shown, not confirmed

Scam. Poor content and impossible to cancel through app. Email correspondence is responded to with offers of reduction. Once it's clear you want to cancel they stop responding. I am hoping my bank can help stop further payments. Do not…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-12

I signed up.. fair...then wanted to cancel....so i tried. no emails, no google subscriptions...so I thought i must have been wrong...no subscription. then get whacked for usd49. their response: "I totally get it - these days it’s so easy…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-11

The app is total scam. First and only proof is the fact that company, DO NOT ISSUE ANY INVOICE, for their services. There is no way to cancel the subscribtion. Only through e-mail on functional mailbox, where you get AI generated…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-07-07

Reports of unexpected charges

Shown, not confirmed

DO NOT DOWNLOAD THIS APP UNLESS YOU PLAN ON PAYING EVERY MONTH EVEN IF YOU DONT HAVE AN ACTIVE ACCOUNT. I downloaded this app just checking it out and decided I didn't actually want it. So I deleted my account and payment info. Come to…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-01-21

This app feels like a complete scam. I was charged a subscription fee without ever knowingly subscribing to their service. There is no clear or transparent way to cancel, and customer support is either slow or unresponsive. Billing…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-03-21

There's no option to cancel your subscription on their app. Reinstalled it and now it says my emaik doesn't exist. It's still charging me the subscription fee. I am stuck. This app is a scam Update, I sent the email again as a response to…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-01-19

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description says how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 25 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 2.7.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .

The store currently lists version 2.7.0, updated 2026-10-22.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 2.7.0 · 2026-10-22

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
ultiself
Assessment date
25 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
400
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-25 from 400 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-25 Version analyzed: 2.7.03 independent signals400 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
4.23 ★ · 8,023 ratings
Version
2.7.0
Updated
22 Oct 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Ultiself
Category
Health & Fitness
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Review thresholds Read the methodology For developers

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.

Report a factual error — free Email a correction