Appworthy
Hard to cancel
2 independent sources agreeHard to cancel: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 67 reviews we read)
Definition
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Unimeal: Fasting and Diet
Set yourself on the road to weight loss with smart fasting, easy calorie and…
AMO AppsGoogle Play rating4.4★28.5K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryHealth & Fitness
DeveloperAMO Apps
What we found
Full reportSerious warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
Money
- Free to download · in-app purchases. Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.
- Hard to cancelConfirmed
- 44 users report unexpected chargesNot confirmed · about 1 in 9 reviews we read
- If you subscribe through the store, cancel in Google Play → Payments & subscriptions → Subscriptions. Deleting the app doesn’t cancel a subscription.
Positives
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.32.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.32.0, updated 2026-09-11.
Preview
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
About this app
Set yourself on the road to weight loss with smart fasting, easy calorie and progress tracking and personalized meal plans with Unimeal!
- Intermittent fasting made easy
Customize your fasting plan based on your goals, experience, and lifestyle. Choose the fasting window that works best for you and the plan will adapt;
- Personalized meal plans
Your plan is based on your unique eating preferences and needs. Choose from keto diet to mediterranean — we always make sure your plans works for you;
- Smart AI scanner
Log your food effortlessly with one tap with the true power of Unimeal’s AI scanner. Scan your meals and get instant nutrition information;
- Easy to use Calorie Tracker
Our calorie and macros tracker helps you stay in control of your nutrition. When you track with ease, staying healthy and fit becomes simple too!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The full report
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings and evidence
Things to watch for 1
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Open evidence
Positives 3
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
States a price, or offers a one-time purchase
MeasuredOffers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "Lifetime access"
Definition
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:93dbad990a66384306ef3c20a51a463647e1dc3abef3acff430f9e12b34924d6No advertising SDKs
MeasuredNo advertising or mediation SDK among the 8 SDKs detected in the package
Definition
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:93dbad990a66384306ef3c20a51a463647e1dc3abef3acff430f9e12b34924d6Developer says data deletion can be requested
MeasuredThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
Definition
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 6
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Paywall blocks the basics
One source onlyThe app's own text says: "Premium access required"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:93dbad990a66384306ef3c20a51a463647e1dc3abef3acff430f9e12b34924d6A plan is pre-picked as 'recommended'
One source onlyPurchase screen steers the choice: "Best value"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:93dbad990a66384306ef3c20a51a463647e1dc3abef3acff430f9e12b34924d6Reports of unexpected charges
One source onlySurprise charges: raised by 44 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 9 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
How we know
Trial terms not stated in the app's own text
One source onlyOffers a free trial ("Free trial guide") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:93dbad990a66384306ef3c20a51a463647e1dc3abef3acff430f9e12b34924d6Usable without an account
One source onlyThe app's own text says: "By continuing, you agree to our"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:93dbad990a66384306ef3c20a51a463647e1dc3abef3acff430f9e12b34924d6Works offline
One source onlyThe app's own text says: "Clear cache"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Definition
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
How we know
Package artefact
sha256:93dbad990a66384306ef3c20a51a463647e1dc3abef3acff430f9e12b34924d6What reviewers report
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Hard to cancel
Published findingNot good for keto. Hard to log individual items. water intake not working. cant cancel subscription easily, have to delete the entire account. Can I get my money back?
Very unhappy about this app...I'm not able to change the preferences of the ingredients...like.. I don't want fish anymore and wanted vegan meals...Once you have done your selection..that's it...Moreover it's like impossible to…
Did the two week option only. No subscription. Yet they deducted for a full month without permission. No way to stop them from deducting from your account. Because you can't cancel without a subscription. Still waiting for refund. 1/10/25…
Reports of unexpected charges
Shown, not confirmedSTAY AWAY FROM THIS APP. I inadvertently selected the personal coach add-on, and as soon as I realised, I contacted them to cancel and request a refund. Despite contacting them numerous times, they have gone silent, and there is no refund…
Dishonest and misleading app – hidden subscription charges! I downloaded this app thinking it was free or at least clear about its costs. Unfortunately, it has hidden subscription fees and secretly charges a yearly fee without any proper…
1/13/25 Scam with payment. Immediately adding extra service that you do not subscribe.They sat accidently8)Once you pay for one membership, you are prompted to add on both sevices. No way forward or back. If you move forward you will be…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Measurements
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
From store data and reviews
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the app package we scanned
Android package 3.32.0, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Sensitive permissions
3–5 requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
Versions and dates analysed
This analysis describes version 3.32.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.32.0, updated 2026-09-11.
Store update history
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Google Play
Version 3.32.0 · 2026-09-11
No release notes were provided for this version.
Assessment record
- Status
- Automated analysis
- App identifier
unimeal- Assessment date
- 27 Oct 2026
- Sources used
- 6 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
- Reviews read
- 400
- Package examined
- Android · 3.32.0 · scanned 27 Oct 2026
- Human inspection
- Not completed
Assessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
How we know
- Measurement vocabulary
- 1.4
How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-27 Version analyzed: 3.32.06 independent signals400 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.
Store facts
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
Google Play
- Store rating
- 4.43 ★ · 28,536 ratings
- Version
- 3.32.0
- Updated
- 11 Sep 2026
- Price
- Free · In-app purchases
- Age rating
- 4+
- Size
- Not supplied
- Developer
- AMO Apps
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Listing price
- Free · In-app purchases
Purchases the store lists
What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.
Method and limits
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Limits of this report
- A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
- Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
- Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
- A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Request a correction
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.