Some warnings 7 users report having to pay to progress; 1 thing we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 6.15.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 6.25.2, updated 2026-10-26.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Step into Vista Bay - a city where gangs, power, and ambition collide.
Urban Heat is a next-generation multiplayer FPS built for mobile. Fast, tactical, and deeply customizable - it combines intense PvP action with RPG-like progression to create a shooter experience that evolves with every match.
FAST-PACED PvP ACTION
Jump into dynamic 5v5 battles where every decision matters.
Master movement, outplay your opponents, and dominate the battlefield.
DEEP CUSTOMIZATION
Build your perfect loadout:
-Weapons with extensive attachments and modules
-Hundreds of possible configurations
-Unique playstyles tailored to you
UNIQUE HEROES
-Unlock and play as 30+ characters, each with:
-Distinct abilities
-Individual playstyles
-Customization options
Find your main. Master your role.
RPG-LIKE PROGRESSION…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 7 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:77b1f2344d8dd4b988cd84dd56f3014a93d1beee2275276437d68c5567cf6359The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:77b1f2344d8dd4b988cd84dd56f3014a93d1beee2275276437d68c5567cf6359Pay to progress: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 57 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
The app's own text says: "%1$s can't run because your device doesn't support Google Play services. Please use a supported device."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:77b1f2344d8dd4b988cd84dd56f3014a93d1beee2275276437d68c5567cf6359Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
i just uninstalled when i saw i had to pay 8 dollars to claim my gun challenges rewards for "license". what a joke. i already see how this game is gonna turn out. another pay to win where EVERYTHING is monetized (even "unlocked"…
This game is overall really good. Smooth and fast gameplay if you have the right wifi. One problem with this is that, there are some pay to win guns (such as Magen-Ar) which make the player too strong. Its almost impossible for the player…
P2w gun parts from crates buyable with real money.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 6.15.0, scanned 29 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 6.15.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 6.25.2, updated 2026-10-26.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
- Improved Gun Licenses tab — track licenses, progress and rewards in one place. - New Character Trials — each character gets a contract chain with unique rewards. - Gun Licenses expanded to Rare weapons — more contracts, more rewards. - Berserk rebalanced — grenades are no longer blocked; grenade, gadget and ability damage is reduced. - Fixed: Smoke now blocks bots' line of sight. Use it to escape!
No release notes were provided for this version.
urban-heatAssessed 2026-10-30 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.