Join the millions of people who have entrusted their privacy and pictures to…
Squid Tooth LLCNothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
From our automated analysis, 9 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 26.09.09 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-09 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 26.09.09, updated 2026-09-10.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Join the millions of people who have entrusted their privacy and pictures to Vaulty: the original and most popular Photo Vault & album locker app on Android.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ “For people with private videos or private pictures on their phone Vaulty could be a life saver.” - BlueStacks
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ “Vaulty asks for the least in return for the most.” - Naked Security
HOW TO USE
▌Hide Pictures & Videos Within Vaulty
1. Open Vaulty, then tap the lock icon at the top,
2. Tap an album,
3. Tap thumbnails to select files, then tap the lock at the top to hide them.
▌”Share” Pictures & Videos From Other Apps
1. While viewing a picture or a video, tap the share icon,
2. Select Vaulty from the list of apps,
3. Vaulty will remove the pictures and videos from your gallery and hide them safely in your vault.
Vaulty is a safe that keeps all of your private pictures and videos hidden behind a pin.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One time purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:0940a62fbd4cceda0e42d6eaacc8325e1cf2e06f641a59a2b733c8db35dfc01cThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Offers a free trial ("Free Trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:0940a62fbd4cceda0e42d6eaacc8325e1cf2e06f641a59a2b733c8db35dfc01cNothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 26.09.09, scanned 25 Sep 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 26.09.09 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-09 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 26.09.09, updated 2026-09-10.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
vaulty-google-com-theronrogers-vaultyfreeAssessed 2026-10-09 from 439 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.