Video player will be a great choice that you should try if you are looking fo…
TFive LabsSome warnings 1 thing we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 1.26 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.26, updated 2026-10-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Video player will be a great choice that you should try if you are looking for an application to play all the videos on your mobile phone or memory card with the best quality. With advanced features such as support for playing videos on all types of video formats, great HD resolution, high frame rates and a lot of other useful features, we are confident that this media player classic will not make you are disappointed.
* Feature:
• Mp4 player on most popular video formats: MKV, MP4, M4V, AVI, MOV, 3GP, FLV, WMV, RMVB, TS ...
• Full HD video player with 1080p resolution, supports 4K
• Detects and displays all videos on your device or SD card, external memory.
• Feature guide: makes it easy for the first time to use.
• Smart video manager: sort videos by name, capacity, update date ...
• Create playlists, video management folders.
• Easily find and view the most recently played video
• Pla…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Allow Ad to create a calendar event?"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:c35e291024f5ebea9a5781bee9328dbe86fb98b1ac91a140fbae220d160d624eThe app's own text says: "Manager the trash"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Package artefact
sha256:c35e291024f5ebea9a5781bee9328dbe86fb98b1ac91a140fbae220d160d624eThe app's own text says: "Go back to default"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:c35e291024f5ebea9a5781bee9328dbe86fb98b1ac91a140fbae220d160d624eThe app's own text says: "Continue playing from where you stopped"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:c35e291024f5ebea9a5781bee9328dbe86fb98b1ac91a140fbae220d160d624eNothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.26, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.26 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.26, updated 2026-10-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
video-player-google-com-ultisw-videoplayerAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.