Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 1,770 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-05.

War Robots Multiplayer Battles

MYGAMES MENA FZ LLC

6v6 PvP Tactical Robo Action

4.3 ★5,803,668 ratings
100M+Downloads
12+Age rating
1066 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

Great to see you, Commander! War Robots is the biggest shooter game about giant robots that fits into your pocket. Join epic PvP battles against rivals from all over the world and show them who’s the smartest, fastest, toughest pilot around! Prepare for surprise attacks, intricate tactical maneuvers and other tricks up enemies’ sleeves. Destroy! Capture! Upgrade! Become stronger — and prove yourself as the best mech commander in the War Robots online universe!

MAIN FEATURES - Choose your fighter. Over 50 robots with unique designs and powers let you find a style to call your own. - Play how you want. Want to crush and destroy? To save and protect? Or just annoy the hell out of your enemies? You can do it all with the massive selection of weapons, including ballistic missiles, plasma cannons, and giant shotguns! - Customize.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
War Robots Multiplayer Battles screenshot 1
War Robots Multiplayer Battles screenshot 2
War Robots Multiplayer Battles screenshot 3
War Robots Multiplayer Battles screenshot 4
War Robots Multiplayer Battles screenshot 5
War Robots Multiplayer Battles screenshot 6
War Robots Multiplayer Battles screenshot 7
War Robots Multiplayer Battles screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 12.4.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 12.4.1, updated 2026-10-06.

The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 12.4.0, not the version now listed on the store.

Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:

Version 12.4.1 · 2026-10-06
SIMULATION ERRORS: Fight your way to victory through simulation glitches! DEDOPALI: Let the turrets do the job! ULTIMATE SHELL: Extra shields in 3-2-1 ! FIXES: Patched bugs and improved optimization. FIXES: Patched bugs and improved optimization.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 12.4.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 12.4.0, updated 2026-09-15.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
3 or more themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 12.4.0, scanned 2026-09-18.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
1–2 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 2

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact 4ebf4e3de745…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Reported by 184 usersReported by users, not measured — nothing we can inspect could show this either wayview evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Raised by 184 distinct reviewers — 15.6% of the 1,179 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).

Context 1

Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.

Cheapest and priciest options are far apart
MeasuredPublished as context — deliberately not a charge · from the store listingview evidence
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
What we saw: In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 19.99 — a 20x spread across 10 items

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (0.6% of 1179 reviews scanned)
In the app's own text: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact 4ebf4e3de745…
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (0.4% of 1179 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Pay to progress
“this game become so much p2w only player who spend money is the Real pro players. when the game had F2W and 1/4 is P2W. now Everything has changed and no responsibility from game none is changing anything the players requested even i am…”
2★ · Google Play · 2026-10-03
Pay to progress
“No word to describe how broken it's. Greedy ruined the game.Ultimate p2w but don't waste your money like I did. Whatever you buy gonna be useless in a short time. Matchmaking sucks. Not even mention it's full of cheaters. "automatic…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-29
Pay to progress
“this game sucks so bad theirs more videos of pay to win tha. their are videos of actual game play”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-10-01

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 12.4.1.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.