🐾 Embark on a wild journey of creativity with Wild Color – the ultimate pain…
BrainArt StudioSome warnings 11 users report an aggressive ad load; 5 users report ads that misrepresent the app. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 367 reviews.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.1.8 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.8, updated 2026-09-30.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
🐾 Embark on a wild journey of creativity with Wild Color – the ultimate paint by number adventure for animal lovers, nature fans, and artistic minds. This isn't just a coloring book, it's your escape into the untamed world of animals, forests, jungles, oceans, mountains, and the free spirit of the west. Tap your way through stunning wildlife illustrations and use intuitive paint by number gameplay to bring the wilderness to life.
🦁 Whether you're drawn to majestic lions on the hunt, peaceful deer in misty woods, vibrant parrots in the tropical jungle, or spooky halloween wildlife moments, Wild Color is your paint by number sanctuary. Each image is hand-designed to highlight the beauty, power, spirit, and magic of the natural world. Relax, explore, and unleash your creativity in the wildest paint by number experience you've ever seen.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 33 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Misleading advertising: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 73 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
367 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
The pictures are amazingly beautiful, but there are 3 reasons I won't play as often as others: 1-Some of the spaces are teeny tiny, making it hard for old people like me. 2-The necessary ads go on unnecessarily long, well over a minute or…
beautiful pictures, especially the 2 scenes in 1. Knocked a star off because if I pause for about 3 seconds the hint ad comes up but it appears wherever my fingers are. It seems to sense where they are. Easy to click on it by accident so…
absolutely beautiful pictures but, EXTREMELY WAY TO MANY ADS...CANT ENJOY IT. in the middle of coloring you get ads sometimes up to three no thanks I'm uninstalling !
None of the advertised pictures of cats doing housework, baking cookies, vacuuming floors and washing dishes, are in your app. You, and everyone else falsely advertising pictures not in their apps need to add the advertised pictures or…
the ad for the app shows dragonflies absolutely not one dragonfly. that was why I downloaded it even got the 3 day free trial subscription thinking maybe the pictures would be unlocked but nothing. so disappointing false advertising would…
This app is falsely advertised as having cats dressed as housewives doing laundry and vacuuming floors with their hair in curlers but it has none of these pictures. This false advertising, that I've seen for all but one app, Retro Color…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.1.8 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.8, updated 2026-09-30.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
wild-colorAssessed 2026-10-27 from 367 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.