Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 1,779 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-06.

Wink: Video Enhancer & Editor

Meitu Technology Co., Ltd.

4K Upscale, Unblur & Retouch

4.5 ★1,104,436 ratings
50M+Downloads
12+Age rating
361 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

Wink is the AI video and photo enhancer that fixes any clip in one tap. Upscale to 4K HD, restore old videos, unblur photos — old home videos, phone footage, whatever you've got.

[ PERFECT FOR ]

• Restoring old family videos, VHS tapes, and home movies • Fixing blurry, shaky, or low-quality phone footage • Upscaling videos for trending short-form video platforms • Reviving faded photos and damaged memories • Polishing night-out clips, travel vlogs, and gaming highlights • Anyone who wants pro-quality video without the editing skills

[ VIDEO & PHOTO ENHANCER ]…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Wink: Video Enhancer & Editor screenshot 1
Wink: Video Enhancer & Editor screenshot 2
Wink: Video Enhancer & Editor screenshot 3
Wink: Video Enhancer & Editor screenshot 4
Wink: Video Enhancer & Editor screenshot 5
Wink: Video Enhancer & Editor screenshot 6
Wink: Video Enhancer & Editor screenshot 7
Wink: Video Enhancer & Editor screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 3.18.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.18.0, updated 2026-09-26.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 3.17.5 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.17.5, updated 2026-09-23.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Says how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 3.17.5, scanned 2026-09-30.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
3–5 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
3–9 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact 6826e3c26c58…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 3 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager)

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 4

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

In the app's own text: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact 6826e3c26c58…
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch an ad to get a free use"
Reported by users: Paywall blocks the basics
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
What we saw: Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 16 distinct reviewers (3.1% of 521 reviews scanned)
In the app's own text: Countdown-timer purchase pressure
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact 6826e3c26c58…
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
What we saw: Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited-time offer"
From the store listing: Usable without an account
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the store privacy disclosure.view evidence
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
What we saw: The store privacy disclosure (6 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Paywall blocks the basics
“It’s great, but — This is a great app, especially for enhancing your quality, but everything cost money. You can only get one minute for the quality enhancer and if you want to get 10 minutes, then you have to pay for it or get a…”
3★ · App Store · 2026-07-09
Paywall blocks the basics
“paywalls — this app sucks they put everything behind a paywall. cant even use the most basic tools that i used to be able to access. so annoying.”
2★ · App Store · 2026-06-14
Paywall blocks the basics
“Bunz — STUPID FILTHY APP GOT MONEY HUNGRY AND JUST HAD TO ADD A SUBSCRIPTION WHERE YOU HAVE TO PAY TO BASICALLY DO ANYTHING”
1★ · App Store · 2026-05-18

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 3.18.0.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.