Looking for a fun and addictive puzzle game that will keep you entertained fo…
PlayfluxSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.7.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.7.1, updated 2026-08-07.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Looking for a fun and addictive puzzle game that will keep you entertained for hours on end? Look no further than Wood Block - Puzzle Games, the ultimate wood block game for you!
With its simple and intuitive gameplay, Wood Block is perfect for puzzle lovers of all ages and skill levels. Simply drag and drop the wooden blocks to fill up the board and complete each level. With increasing levels of difficulty, you'll never run out of challenges to tackle!
Wood Block - Puzzle Games also provides a solution to the problem of boredom and lack of mental stimulation. With wood block, you can keep your mind active and engaged, which is essential for maintaining cognitive health. Additionally, the game provides a fun and entertaining way to pass the time, which is especially important when you're waiting for something or need a break from work or study…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:bd8497f9f189517cb14550ded7af298decad0b31494e203c6ebc3c58f797992bAggressive ad load: raised by 14 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 29 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Misleading advertising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 67 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
The app's own text says: "delete"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:bd8497f9f189517cb14550ded7af298decad0b31494e203c6ebc3c58f797992b400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
play 4 levels no ads and asked to rate.... play 4 more and get bombarded with ads. the story gimmick is annoying. the poor helpless women can't take care of themselves so you have to save them with stars and clicks to fix them a perfect…
At first it's a great game...then after you go so far the ads become ridiculous. The game then stops you when you need a few gems just to make you watch more ads. This is the most infuriating game. Just an algorithm to show the most ads…
Fun game, easy to get into. However uninstalled it due to too many ads. You gotta make a buck in the free game, I get it, but my time is valuable too.
not what I saw on the ad I thought as you played you rescued different things like the old man or animals like in the AD I really hate false advertising it's just like any other block story game
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.7.1, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.7.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.7.1, updated 2026-08-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
wood-blockAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.