Welcome to Woodoku Blast: The Mesmerizing Colorful Block Puzzle Game!
Tripledot Studios LimitedNo specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 10 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.28.01 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.30.01, updated 2026-10-14.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to Woodoku Blast: The Mesmerizing Colorful Block Puzzle Game!
Prepare yourself for an addictive puzzle adventure like no other, where you can blast blocks on Sudoku grid. Woodoku Blast is here to captivate your senses and challenge your puzzle-solving skills, even offline and with no Wifi. Dive into a world of vibrant colors, creative challenges, and endless block puzzle fun – all in the palm of your hand.
Easy to Learn, Challenging to Master:
Woodoku Blast's simple and intuitive gameplay makes becoming a block master accessible to players of all ages. Place colorful blocks on the block puzzle grid, clear lines on the Sudoku inspired layout, and score points to progress through the levels, all while enjoying the game offline with no Wifi required..…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:70d2cf8460e7b6216825148d6d3992c3a95fab1b71016d67d6eab8de129aa112Aggressive ad load: raised by 87 distinct reviewers (9.0% of 962 reviews scanned)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
962 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 87 distinct reviewers — 9.0% of the 962 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).
It would be nice to pay to remove ads. It gets annoying sitting through ads after every level completion.
You literally can't even get through the tutorial without an ad playing. 4.8 fake stars. Nobody's time is worth this.
Great game riddled with ads after EVERY level makes it not fun to play at all. I can tolerate ads, but not like this. Do NOT download this game unless you want more ads than actual gameplay. It's one of the worst I come across!
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 1.28.01, scanned 8 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.28.01 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.30.01, updated 2026-10-14.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
woodoku-blast-google-com-tripledot-blockbashAssessed 2026-10-10 from 962 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.