Wool Saga 3D – Yarn Games brings you a quiet, relaxing wool sort casual game…
BLANKZONET PTE. LTD.Some warnings 32 users report an aggressive ad load; 9 users report ads that misrepresent the app. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.2330 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.2330, updated 2026-10-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Wool Saga 3D – Yarn Games brings you a quiet, relaxing wool sort casual game experience made for unwinding. This yarn game is about finding peace with soft wool and colorful 3d yarn games. Step into a world where every yarn sort move feels gentle and every wool puzzle is easy to enjoy. In this 3d wool sort world, you can explore simple logic puzzles at your own pace. This wool puzzle games app is designed for casual 3d wool moments of comfort and simple fun.
🎮 Simple and Relaxing Casual Game Play
Enjoy effortless interactions in our 3d yarn games as you explore cozy scenes. Each moment of these logic puzzles feels intuitive, offering a yarn sort casual game flow you can jump into instantly. Just tap the 3d yarn and relax. Our wool sort yarn game lets you play without any pressure. If you like a calm 3d wool sort, you will enjoy how the yarn moves in every wool puzzle.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 32 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 13 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Misleading advertising: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 44 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I really enjoy the game. I haven't found one that I liked till this one. But the constant ads is too much. if you need a booster tool you have to watch an ad for every single one or to open block. if you pass level you have to watch ad…
I have private DNS adguard on and your ads are going around it and forcing me to watch ads! so your game is getting uninstalled because I don't want to watch any ads ever! I was willing to put money into the game and actually did buy…
too many ads
not what's advertised
this game false advertising says no ads!! that why I downloaded it but go figure it has ads starting level 20
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.2330 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.2330, updated 2026-10-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
wool-saga-3d-google-wool-thread-saga-triple-match-sortAssessed 2026-10-25 from 400 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.