Some warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 16.10.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 16.10.6, updated 2026-10-16.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Slay your style 👗. Create your world 🎨. Connect with friends 🤝.
Step into Woozworld — a social metaverse where fashion, creativity, and friends define who you are. Express yourself with bold outfits, design unique spaces, and connect with players worldwide in a constantly evolving community.
STYLE 👗
• Customize your avatar with thousands of trendy clothes, hairstyles, and accessories
• Discover new outfit drops every week
• Join fashion contests and host shows to shine in the spotlight
CREATE 🎨
• Design and decorate rooms from stylish hangouts to epic party spaces
• Craft custom furniture and clothing
• Launch games, contests, and social events
CONNECT 🤝
• Meet and chat with players from around the globe
• Snap selfies 📸, strike poses, and capture moments with friends
• Join parties 🎉, clubs, and challenges where creativity shines…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 4 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), ironSource / Unity LevelPlay, Tapjoy, Unity Ads
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:3ba0d6613f4ef7bb43f0ec1ef2dde8c85071d1cda2e106d7e36455ff5bec944aSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "A new site will open in %1$d seconds. Remember to stay safe online and don’t share your username or password with anyone!"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:3ba0d6613f4ef7bb43f0ec1ef2dde8c85071d1cda2e106d7e36455ff5bec944aNo review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 16.10.6, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 16.10.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 16.10.6, updated 2026-10-16.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
woozworldAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.