Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 463 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version v1.0.21 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version v1.0.21, updated 2026-04-09.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Word Search Master is a word puzzle games to find words. If you are interested at search words or connect words offline, or find the words in word search games, this word search game should be your good choice.
This wordsearch is good word games for adults and kids to improve vocabulary and explore in the search word world. If you are a father or a mother looking after children, these kids word search puzzles are good for kids to do word play and learn word spelling, and also improve them word seek skills. And also finding words will train your brain.
This brain word puzzle game is as interesting as word connect games and word cross games. In this word search puzzle game, many word letters will be on the board, and when you find a word, you can make a word by connecting the word letters in a line. After you find all your words in a level, you finish a word search puzzle.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 11 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Chartboost, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange and 7 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:fb9b6e43e2d100ef5e9f40a0aa05c1753bc4d2b9f7f509122e1511d29de430b0Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch a video to earn a reward!"
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:fb9b6e43e2d100ef5e9f40a0aa05c1753bc4d2b9f7f509122e1511d29de430b0463 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
so many advertisement
wayyyy too many ads! after every level and they are the misleading ones that say "app is out of date, click to update" but it's for a different game 😑
loving ❤️ it, but leaving because so many ads on free ap takes 2 X longer to get thru ads than it takes to solve the puzzles
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package v1.0.21, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version v1.0.21 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version v1.0.21, updated 2026-04-09.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Fix known issues.
No release notes were provided for this version.
word-search-masterAssessed 2026-10-30 from 463 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.