Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.

Word Spells: Game for Adults

Welcome to Word Spells – word games free for adults!

Malpa Games
Multiple ad networks — Code from multiple ad networksDeletion (dev says) — Developer says you can request data deletion
Google Play rating4.8★321.3K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryGames
DeveloperMalpa Games

At a glance

Full report

From our automated analysis, 10 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 2.63 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 2.64, updated 2026-10-08.

The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 2.63, not the version now listed on the store.

The developer’s release notes for the newer versions, where we hold them, are in Versions and dates analysed.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Welcome to Word Spells – word games free for adults! 🧡

These offline puzzles are a wonderful mix of crossword and word games for adults! Search for words 10 minutes a day to improve your lexical and brain skills. This is a word game with more than 5000 levels for people who want to keep their minds sharp. 🧠 Are you ready to take the challenge?

SIMPLE GAMEPLAY

Have you played spelling games or anagrams before? It’s just as fun! Drag your finger across the screen to connect letters. The crossword serves as a great clue to see how many words are still to be found. Beginner, amateur, or master – everyone will feel the excitement and relaxation at the same time! 🤩

PERFECT WORD GAME FOR YOU…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

2 published · 1 shown, not confirmed

Things to watch for 1

Findings that met the published evidence standard.

Multiple ad networks bundled

Measured

Bundles 17 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AdColony, Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine and 13 more

Sources
SDKs in the app package
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package
Definition

The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.

Package artefact

sha256:3c214a9261148a348c8304620fd1d9d4d99f3a1d8f682cc20226dfa2a3a27a89

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Aggressive ad load

One source only

Aggressive ad load: raised by 22 distinct reviewers (4.8% of 458 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

Open evidence

What reviewers report

458 reviews read · 1 review-based observation

458 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Shown, not confirmed

I've gone through loads of word games. Most of them are fine,except they have loads of ads and charge around $10 to get rid of them. This one charges a very low fee to get rid of ads. The play itself is fun. There's a space for bonus…

5★ · Google Play · 2026-05-03

absurd amount of ads. it's unbearable and invasive. I've never seen so many ads in one game in my life.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-16

Waaaaaaaaaay too many ads. Would be fun otherwise. Uninstalling.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-10-10

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

8 measured · 0 not assessed

Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

Android package 2.63, scanned 7 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.

Sensitive permissions
None requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 10 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 2.63 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 2.64, updated 2026-10-08.

The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 2.63, not the version now listed on the store.

Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:

Version 2.64 · 2026-10-08

No release notes were provided for this version.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 2.64 · 2026-10-08

No release notes were provided for this version.

Version 2.63 · 2026-10-08

No release notes were provided for this version.

Version 2.63 · 2026-09-23

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
word-spells-google-com-openmygame-magicwordsearch
Assessment date
10 Oct 2026
Sources used
6 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
458
Package examined
Android · 2.63 · scanned 7 Oct 2026
Measurement vocabulary
1.4
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-10 from 458 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-10 Version analyzed: 2.636 independent signals458 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
4.77 ★ · 321,345 ratings
Version
2.64
Updated
8 Oct 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Malpa Games
Category
Games
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.