Word Puzzle and Trivia Game
FUGO BILISIM TEKNOLOJILERI VE YAZILIM TICARET ANONIM SIRKETISerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 578 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.4.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 3.4.0, updated 2026-10-16.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
A classy approach to classical crossword puzzles!
A brand new word game from the developers of Words of Wonders: Crossword and Words of Wonders: Search.
A true trivia game with challenges as you connect the letters and progress through the levels!
Travel around the world, find the words and become the Guru of your language!
- Test your knowledge against dictionaries and encyclopedias
- Relax your brain by playing with your friends and family
- Immerse yourself in the true crossword experience as you explore the wonders of the world
- Native content for multiple languages
Words of Wonders: Guru is the latest next-generation word game by Fugo Games for our audience of over 100 million spread across all continents. Take your time to enjoy the most relaxing backgrounds of nature and historical places as you make your way through the wonders of the world!
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:3a1e81bb601b33428eb623d01eba7ac9e2ca6360a1c55e6e4afb0bea88832ea7Aggressive ad load: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 64 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:3a1e81bb601b33428eb623d01eba7ac9e2ca6360a1c55e6e4afb0bea88832ea7The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:3a1e81bb601b33428eb623d01eba7ac9e2ca6360a1c55e6e4afb0bea88832ea7578 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Latest gimmick to make you watch additional ads is to say you didn't play the game yesterday (when you know you did). This necessitates watching additional ads for the privilege of playing yesterday's game (again).
used to actually enjoy playing this game but they recently have decided to start placing ad banners at the bottom of the screen & maybe it doesn't effect everyone's phone in this way but with mine it covers up part of the letters so…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.4.0, scanned 20 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.4.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 3.4.0, updated 2026-10-16.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
As the air turns crisp and the nights grow longer, we’re excited to bring you a fresh update to keep your mind sharp and your spirits high! Continue your Guru journey with fun new features: - Visual improvements - Faster gameplay - Test your vocabulary with fresh puzzles every day! Happy puzzling, and see you next time!
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
words-of-wonders-apple-1540919737Assessed 2026-10-30 from 578 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.