Looking for WW2 first person shooter games around?
Azur Interactive Games LimitedFrom our automated analysis, 5 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.57.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.57.0, updated 2026-08-18.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Looking for WW2 first person shooter games around? Battle players from around the world in a crazy WWII-era online first person shooter game!
Destroy the enemy and survive tank battles in the center of Berlin and other cities. Participate in team and deathmatch battles, plant bombs and defend them, take part in world war massive warfare!
Why you'll love playing World War Heroes first person shooter:
✯ Play on 12+ legendary WWII battle warzones!
✯ 4 types of combat equipment from the USA, USSR, Japan and Germany!
✯ Enjoy 6 dynamic shooter game modes and even create Custom Games with your own rules.
✯ Operate your own tank on the battlefield!
✯ 100+ unique weapon types: pistols, sniper rifles, machine guns, shotguns and more!
Rules of war:
✯ Team deathmatch!
Two teams fight for domination. The team with the highest score at the end of the round wins;…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:3b1eda2d9099d8382eb2f27e90c875c2412be4ff76ab06344172699f8876933aPay to progress: raised by 31 distinct reviewers (4.5% of 684 reviews scanned)
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (0.7% of 684 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
684 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 31 distinct reviewers — 4.5% of the 684 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).
Alot of fun until you get matched up with people using the TOP weapons in the game. It makes the matches completely unfair and unplayable. Get ready to quit a bunch of match ups until you find one that is fair. Those people with the TOP…
this game is the definition of pay to win. as you progress you will run into people who have far superior weapons and are above your level and you will be one shot and unable to do anything all match. not to mention all the consumables…
Dudes just spend $100 to win. This is the most pay-to-win FPS.
No sampled quote is attached to this observation.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 1.57.0, scanned 19 Sep 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.57.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.57.0, updated 2026-08-18.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
world-war-heroes-google-com-gamedevltd-wwhAssessed 2026-10-05 from 684 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.