From our automated analysis, 14 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.0.132 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-14 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.0.132, updated 2026-09-26.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
The Evil Void tears the continent asunder, while the Undead Plague devours the last remnants of civilization! In this dual apocalypse, only the worthy shall rebuild the realm!
To survive this cataclysm, you must master both strategic command and survival instinct!
Here's a tip for champions: True power lies not in brute strength, but in forging unbreakable bonds with your companions. Assemble your fellowship wisely - their lineage holds the key to victory.
Highlighted Features:
- Brand new level experience with multiple choices
- Play One-Handed to dominate the continent!
- Unveil the mysteries and experience various strategic gameplays
- Collect and match, unravel the mysteries of the void
- Strengthen your power, and form alliances with others to receive the greatest support!
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Misleading advertising: raised by 82 distinct reviewers (16.3% of 502 reviews scanned)
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Ships a purchase screen ("Get PRO version…") with no dismiss, skip or "continue free" text anywhere in the package
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
A paywall screen ships with no dismiss, skip or 'maybe later' affordance anywhere in the package, so the app's own text offers no way in without paying.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:3840f4074926816fd41098d5bc4579189345e7343a4291bf751af7531928f663Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:3840f4074926816fd41098d5bc4579189345e7343a4291bf751af7531928f663Aggressive ad load: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (2.2% of 502 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
502 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 82 distinct reviewers — 16.3% of the 502 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).
ad is extremely misleading. the response to this is terrible as well. no the ad for the game is not accurate. I thought it would be a fun a little game where you find the little dudes and shoot them, but no it's one of those coin…
I LIKED the game a year ago, but suddenly the entire game has changed entirely? They even changed the game the false advertisingfrom line drawing to whatever it is now. They probably had to or something because they probably got a letter…
Honestly, this game oughta be sued for false advertising. Because this is probably the biggest bait-and-switch I have ever fallen for. If all you want is to play the game in the ads that probably brought you here and is shown in the…
An absolute jumbled mess of a game. It appeared like someone took multiple different genres of game, and smashed them all together to deliver a confusing and insane experience to anyone who opens the app. It starts with the dog-bee line…
Just another Castle building game. Forced ads. Stupid. Already deleting.
constant ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 1.0.132, scanned 14 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.0.132 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-14 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.0.132, updated 2026-09-26.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
x-clash-google-com-xman-na-gpAssessed 2026-10-14 from 502 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.