Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 431 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 22 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.6.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-22 .
The store currently lists version 3.6.3, updated 2026-10-15.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Yatzy GO! is a high-performance digital adaptation of the classic 13-round dice strategy game, widely recognized as Yahtzee, Yatze, Yatzi, or Kniffel. It optimizes the traditional board game experience for competitive mobile play, integrating a physics-based dice engine with global multiplayer systems.
Core Innovation: Fever Time
Unlike standard dice games, Yatzy GO! introduces the Fever Time mechanic. Triggered during specific match phases, this feature grants all players an additional roll opportunity per round, strategically shifting the probability of achieving high-value combinations like a Large Straight or a Yatzy.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 15 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 11 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:6b12b138cc224a4b9eb0fbfdac5fd986e032c30fcec35f1576b6ddef042f8ae5Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 20 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 22 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Offers a free trial ("product is in free trial peroid?") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:6b12b138cc224a4b9eb0fbfdac5fd986e032c30fcec35f1576b6ddef042f8ae5431 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I get it, you have to monetize the efforts, however, the number of ads is unbearable. I'm not spending 3.99 per week, to play. I'll roll my own dice.
way too many ads, ads you can't get out of making you lose bonus dice. otherwise I like the game itself. please cut back on the ads. it also crashes a lot, please do something about that too
Ads after every single game and achievements aren't unlocking
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.6.3, scanned 22 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.6.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-22 .
The store currently lists version 3.6.3, updated 2026-10-15.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
yatzy-go-classic-dice-gameAssessed 2026-10-22 from 431 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.