Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 419 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.5.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.5.2, updated 2026-10-19.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Join millions of fanatical Yatzy players. Get the best dice game ever: Yazy! It is
simple, fast to learn and offers you guaranteed fun!
Yatzy is composed of 13 rounds. There are five dice that can be rolled up to
three times in each round. At any moment you can choose one of the 13
category boxes to score the result you achieved. Many of the sets are Poker
like, such as 3 of a kind, 4 of a kind, straights, etc. Some call it dice poker
game.
You have to score once and only once in each category box. You must think,
judge and develop your skills to progress and improve your gaming abilities. As
the game unfolds your category boxes start to run out. The objective is to
achieve the highest score from these 13 rounds.
Features:
- The best tutorial for the new players
- Best, easiest interface you will find anywhere
- Customizable dice colors
- 4 playing options…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:33e6250dec5ab3f992368ce85e4990405db81aec37d48233b7c4a67dce7cf9edAggressive ad load: raised by 15 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 28 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:33e6250dec5ab3f992368ce85e4990405db81aec37d48233b7c4a67dce7cf9edThe app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:33e6250dec5ab3f992368ce85e4990405db81aec37d48233b7c4a67dce7cf9ed419 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Fun version of Yatzee because I can play myself without waiting for others. Few too many ads but I'm not docking it a star.
I changed apps to this one because they don't make you watch 2 or 3 ads at a time.
this app sucks. Ad after ad after ad.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.5.2, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.5.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.5.2, updated 2026-10-19.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Thank you for playing Yazy! To improve our game for you, we regularly bring updates to the App Store with improvements for both speed and reliability. If you enjoy Yazy, would you mind taking a moment to write a review on the App Store? We'd greatly appreciate it. Here's What's New: - Bug fixes
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
yazy-yatzy-dice-gameAssessed 2026-10-30 from 419 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.