“If your game wasn't so pay to win maybe there would be a chance of beating the recently added missions. If prototype weapons were in cases for gold you would have no problem selling out to thousands more. But no, that would be too simple…”
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 485 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.
Zombie Gunship Survival: AC130
FlaregamesDive into the dark, deadly world of Zombie Gunship Survival – the ultimate zo…
4.6 ★394,256 ratings
10M+Downloads
12+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases
About this app
Dive into the dark, deadly world of Zombie Gunship Survival – the ultimate zombie survival game that combines the thrill of drone shooting games with the intense horror of the zombie apocalypse! Take command of the legendary AC-130 gunship and drone, powerful tools in your battle against the relentless zombie waves. As the apocalypse unfolds, you’ll find yourself in a desperate fight for survival, where every shot counts.
In this horror game, the AC-130 gunship drone becomes your primary weapon in defending humanity from the undead. Shoot down zombie waves from the skies and experience the terror of the zombie apocalypse like never before. As one of the last survivors, your mission is to use the AC-130 gunship to provide crucial support to ground forces in their fight against the zombies onslaught.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
The evidence behind this assessment
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
This analysis describes version 1.7.54 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.7.54, updated 2026-09-15.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
From the package we downloaded and read — version 1.7.54, scanned 2026-09-28.
Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
1–2 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Multiple ad networks bundled
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 10 distinct reviewers (2.1% of 485 reviews scanned)
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“Zero stars !!! Good game, played for years. Bad Google play ads integration, broken events with hidden conditions.Events and endgame ARE 100% pay to win. Took them only 9 years to remove an exploit.”
“it's fun but clearly pay to win or increase your odds to complete very repetitive missions. honestly the best version of this game was the AR version by Limbic. I don't understand why they always gotta take the best parts of the game and…”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 1.7.54.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.