Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 1,000 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 10.89 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 10.89, updated 2026-09-29.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 0.0.1073 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 0.0.1073, updated 2026-10-02.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Quite good game, addictive 👌! 4 stars only for ads after almost every level. Playing around 25 to 35 seconds and then around 1 minutes of ads. But I would still warmly suggest this game as one of the best 👌! (ads helping to world go…
Way too many long ads! I started playing this for fetch points and made a lot. I really like the game but there are way too many ads! Win or lose the level and still get an ad. Supposed to have 15 min of unlimited lives and half of it is…
I've spent 3 days on level 199. It cannot be done without spending real money and I refuse to do that. I might be willing to keep trying longer, but inescapable ads every other round make it not worth it. I spend more time closing and…
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
Started Out Fun — I really enjoyed this game until I made it too far. Now it’s just annoying. You only get 5 lives so you have to wait or make in app purchase’s, which I did, but not when it stops being fun. I tried deleting the app to…
harddd levels — fun game but the levels get really hard and then you run out of lives.
Fun at first — So this games starts out fun and with a little skill you can move through the first 50+ levels. However after that it becomes an exercise in how many time ca. you stand to play the same level for the game will “allow” you…
Pay to progress
After playing many levels over several days, it seemed that I would have to spend money on coins to continue to advance as there are levels that are nearly impossible unless you guess right several times to beat without any boosts…
Love the game. I just don't like the greed of it's creators. You're supposed to be able to watch a video to gain more "lives". I keep getting the "circle" saying that I have no internet connection. Yet I have full WiFi and Data…
the game would be great but if you do not pay to remove ads then you will lose all the tournaments, competitions and events because the ads force you to watch them while the other players continue to play . they emailed me and told me its…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 6 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.