We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 6.23.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 6.23.0, updated 2026-10-05.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 7
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
TOO MUCH ADS ON MY IPHONE HOME SCREEN AND I ALREADY GOT RID OF IT — 1 star
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False advertising — It tells you that it’s free then it charges. Which I should have known that nothing with Apple is free
False advertising — Cost too much , I swear it said free
Not a good app for cleaning — Bad ai that cannot distinguish anything, and fake advertising. Spent 20 minutes going through photos only to be told I can only delete 5 per day!!
Paywall blocks the basics
Scam — Apps really shouldn’t be allowed to gate 98% of their functionality behind a paywall and call themselves free
Trial converts to a charge
BEWARE — I downloaded this app to see if it would help my phone. I had the free trial for roughly 5 days and canceled the FREE trial well within the cancellation period meanwhile I was charged not one not twice but 3 times for a free…
SCAM — I decided to try it for the free trial and once I got in it took forever for the app to scan my photos and let alone delete them. The app didn’t notify that the free trial has ended and it began to charge every month two times a…
Charged for the free trial — I would like a refund was told there was a free trial and it charged me.
Hard to cancel
Can’t even refund anything — Downloaded and it said i can make a free trail for 7 days £0 and now I can’t cancel it or I pay £10
Reports of unexpected charges
Scam — It’s a scam don’t use it!! They steal your money before trial over and don’t clean anything!! SCAM DONT USE IT
DO NOT USE THIS APP — Scams you from money and won’t refund !!!!!!
Fraudulent billing — I canceled this and it is still trying to auto renew and charging my card. Double check your statements because I clearly canceled it. I have a screenshot stating I canceled it way before the cutoff. This is theft…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.