What’s the catch? Trial converts to a charge — reported by 41 users.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 3.5.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.5.5, updated 2026-09-25.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
No way to cancel services — There is no way to cancel services within the app and you will be charged after the trial period. I sent an email in to stop services and cancel the free trial 24 hours before being charged as stated in their…
Horrible — I paid for the year cause it was suppose to be a 3 day free trial and didn’t even give me a trial it charged my card the whole amount and they refused my refund and tried to charge me again I never got to use it
Charged for free trial — I should’ve read the reviews but they really did charge 69$ for a free trial and dont bother asking apple because you wont get a refund
Reports of unexpected charges
No response from support keep billing canceled — Please review and refund as I have proof faxes never worked and need my money you took out 2 payments of 9$ that's a lot for no use at all please fix and I will remove review
Took my money — I downloaded the app and it said to try it out for 3 days for free. I clicked on it and it didn’t give me the 3 days. Instead it charged me $69.99 and I haven’t gotten my money back. I’ve been emailing them for 2 months…
FREE TRIAL SCAM!!!!!! NO REFUND — DO NOT RECOMMEND *********The amount is charged immediately and no free trial is given. Charged $69.99. Tried getting refund immediately. No response from customer service email.*******. Wish we could sue…
Hard to cancel
No way to cancel services — There is no way to cancel services within the app and you will be charged after the trial period. I sent an email in to stop services and cancel the free trial 24 hours before being charged as stated in their…
No Way to Cancel — There is no way in the app to cancel the free trial. I have contacted support with no answer and can’t find any way to cancel. Don’t use this app unless you plan to fax a lot of documents or you don’t mind being charged…
Difficult to impossible to cancel and automatically renews. Waste of money and support slow if at al — Don’t do it
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False Advertising — This application says free then when I download it I was charged $63.00!!!
TERRIBLE — THE WORST SERVICE I'VE EVER USED IN MY LIFE! They promise you a 3-day free trial and then charge you $74... DO NOT SUBSCRIBE, IT'S FALSE ADVERTISING.
False Advertising — Downloaded the app and subscribed per the three day free subscription. Canceled the subscription almost immediately and I was still charged $74.19. Tried to dispute with Apple and PayPal. No luck. Complete scam. Do not…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 6 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.