Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 2,055 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 2026.40 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2026.40, updated 2026-10-05.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 2026.39 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2026.39, updated 2026-09-25.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Fake Promos — I get notifications about 50% off up to a certain amount but I’m never able to claim them. This app has flaws and false advertising and I’m about ready to sue
Don't believe the delivery times — My review is the grubhub service, not the app. Ay least in my area options are advertised as 20-30 minutes but once the order is placed it changes to 60+ minutes.
Price keeps rising
I had two separate calls from foreigners trying to help me "return a payment' that was already refunded hours prior. EDIT: I give up. Increasing prices and fees, and now a forced light mode. Too obnoxious.
No longer supports my area. 48 out of 50 stores and restaurants refuse to do business with them in my area, for price gouging. I've asked. Also prices are way too high for customers. They want $28 for a burger I can go and get myself for…
"no delivery fees" but jacked up prices. by the time your ready to checkout, its way more expensive.
Reports of unexpected charges
literal scam app. changed me for food that never came. refuse to refund or anything. Just robbed me and have to go to credit card to dispute the charge now.
this is absolutely the worst delivery app possible. The drivers are awful but the company in general is far worse. Oh your credit because we're terrible expires on the 29th? Well its the 29th and it should still be available cause it's…
Food missing they refuse to refund or re-send missing items.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.