What’s the catch? Reports of unexpected charges — reported by 48 users.
Analyzed automatically from 6 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
App Store
This analysis describes version 10.5.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 10.5.2, updated 2026-10-02.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 10.14.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 10.14.0, updated 2026-10-02.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports of unexpected charges
Scam company — They stole my money; I never received what was sent via TaskRabbit delivery. It’s a scam—the worst app for keeping your money safe.
they steal your money — they charge a large percentage just for receiving money on their app. Not worth using
Trash — This app never works for me. Never has work for me. Don’t do it. You try to send money and it says it’s a scam even though you know it’s a money sending app.
Aggressive ad load
The new layout for this app is just horrible. Can't see anything in detail anymore and just very full of ads now.
Had to Google how to log out! Difficult to find the process to log out and I always do at the end of transactions. Also had to Google how to access statements directly rather than via the notification email. Too much ad stuff causing…
new update is horrible, clunky, confusing full of ads....old version was lovely to use.
Tracking and data collection concerns
POS APP! & Support. Gimmicky features. Cluttered junk app. 1 Big Advertisement — Doesn’t show reward redemption activity. Fizzled out app at all clicks within app. Read most recent reviews and decide for yourself or believe the fake…
Selling your purchase data — PayPal is selling your purchase data to third parties for their ad placements in-app. Turn off personalized shopping and ads in the app settings.
PayPal lies and commits consumer fraud — I would NEVER use PayPal. PayPal also SELLS YOUR DATA. They lie to consumers and the same accounts they reject their competitors have no problem with. If you use PayPal you risk being hacked.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.