Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 1,006 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 3.0.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.0.4, updated 2026-09-16.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 3.0.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.1.1, updated 2026-09-30.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 3.0.4, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 3.1.1 · 2026-09-30
No release notes were provided for this version.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Game is good but some figures are too small for senior adults to recognize due to eyesight issues. Yes, even when the zoom is used on the tablet screen. It isn't fun when you can't finish a puzzle due to game control. Also, you should at…
Was a fun game until I made one purchase... Pretty disappointing that all optional ads disappear after you pay to remove the forced ads. If I had known, I wouldn’t have purchased the ads remover. Sometimes it is just too hard to get past…
Today, adds after every game has ruined it. I've enjoyed this game so much because it was ad-free and uninterrupted. Now, it's between every game and those really annoying ones where you have to watch, wait, click to Google play, exit…
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
overall good game. Just wish there were more opportunities for free lives. some levels are quite difficult and once you've used all the clocks etc it seems impossible. have to wait until the lives refill. have started to spend £ to try to…
you need to fix it. I am directly over and over tapping the correct object but 1 or 2 or 3 objects are chosen except what Im choosing then I lose lives and have to wait forever to get more lives. you need to replenish lives faster or up…
Love but Rewards are Few — I love the triple match game. There are no others that are quite like it. The downside for is the lack of rewards or ways to earn boosters or coins. It makes the game slow going if you hit a hard level and don’t…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
The game is nothing like the one in the ad. That would be much more interesting. This is false advertising.
The advert shown is not the game they make you play. You have to play some other dreadful game in order for them to let you play the mini game - the one they advertised. Very misleading
Get Rid Of The Ridiculous Ads That Pop Up Constantly Now!! — For several weeks now, ads pop up from the bottom center of the screen constantly like flies buzzing around a dead carcass which is what this game is going to be if they don’t…
Pay to progress
This game was so much fun, I loved the challenge to keep my mind sharp in my late 60's but the further you get in the game the levels become impossible to beat without spending money. I am deleting the game because I can't afford it…
Really fun and cozy... but at the end of the day each level definitely has a TIMER and it's pay-to-win. Pretty great though
Fun until... — I loved the game until I hit the upper levels when it is impossible to advance without spending $$$.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.