DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Vrbo: Vacation Rentals
HomeAway.com, Inc. · Lifestyle

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 1,850 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: High3 signal sources1,850 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-05
 Which version this describes

App Store

This analysis describes version 2026.40 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 2026.40, updated 2026-10-05.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 2026.39.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 2026.39.0, updated 2026-09-25.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Hard to cancel: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (0.4% of 1190 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (0.6% of 1190 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Hard to cancel

Clunky, confusing and unreliable. The bookings are requests that need host approval, but you can't cancel the request on the app. One host tried to increase the cost by $60 a night after I requested it, and another told me the dates were…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-03

too difficult to cancel reservations. had to waste a bunch of time messaging customer service to get it resolved

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-28

Vrbo is a nightmare to cancel a reservation. The cancelation button sends you to a call center in India. They tell you that they are having a technical difficulty, their backend team will be sorting it out, all lies, to get you to give up…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-18

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

VRBO does not take responsibility for false advertising. The listing advertised AC in text and photos. Host admitted in writing there's none, then went silent. VRBO punted to Expedia, whose rep verbally promised a full refund — so I…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-20

💚I love vrbo, BUT FALSE ADVERTISING!! can you please post all charges & fees on rentals, services, etc? Upfront they say all charges are included. Aren't taxes part of the charges? If not... could they please be specific when advertising…

3★ · Google Play · 2026-08-26

DO NOT USE VRBO — To be quite honest with you, they are so unprofessional and have false advertisement. The host are the ones that own and are the only ones that can cancel or confirm a booking so if the host doesn’t speak to you, doesn’t…

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-14

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-05 Version analyzed: 2026.40 (App Store), 2026.39.0 (Google Play)3 independent signals1,850 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.