Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Surprise charges
Awful experience — Basically stole fro me. Double charged and then made me jump thru hoops to even try to get a refund. Broken machine and they couldn’t confirm refund for that either.
Machine no good — Even tho I choose heavy load three times the washer doesn’t spin completely and I have wash the load over again and I can’t get a refund. NO GOOD
Took my money did not extend my time on dryer — First the washers did not spin alll the water out of my load. It wasn’t overloaded. Then I extended the dryer time and it added time on the app not my actual dryer
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.