Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 1,108 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-06.

Boom Beach: War Strategy Game

Supercell

Epic RTS Base-Building Battles

4.5 ★6,548,779 ratings
100M+Downloads
9+Age rating
996 MBApp size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

Welcome to Boom Beach: come with a plan or leave in defeat!

Fight the evil Blackguard with brains and brawn in this epic strategy game. Engage in intense war and combat enemy bases to free enslaved islanders and unlock the secrets of this tropical paradise. Create a Task Force with players around the world to take on the enemy together in fierce multiplayer combat. Scout, plan, then BOOM THE BEACH in this action-packed RTS warzone!

Experience the thrill of war and shooting as you engage in RTS combat. Strengthen your army and build a powerful kingdom to dominate the warzone. Utilize strategy and war skills to conquer enemy bases and emerge victorious in this multiplayer RTS war game.

Strengthen your defenses and expand your kingdom as you explore the vast archipelago. Only the bravest will lead their kingdom to ultimate supremacy in Boom Beach's thrilling RTS warzone.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Boom Beach: War Strategy Game screenshot 1
Boom Beach: War Strategy Game screenshot 2
Boom Beach: War Strategy Game screenshot 3
Boom Beach: War Strategy Game screenshot 4
Boom Beach: War Strategy Game screenshot 5
Boom Beach: War Strategy Game screenshot 6
Boom Beach: War Strategy Game screenshot 7
Boom Beach: War Strategy Game screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 63.202 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 63.202, updated 2026-09-15.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 63.202 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 63.211, updated 2026-10-02.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 63.202, scanned 2026-09-29.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
1–2 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact 9bb7de265e71…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more

Context 1

Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.

Cheapest and priciest options are far apart
MeasuredPublished as context — deliberately not a charge · from the store listingview evidence
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
What we saw: In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 99.99 — a 101x spread across 10 items

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 577 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Pay to progress
“very p2w game I recomend do not download the game unless you wanna pay 10usd every month to get instant training without which the game is literally not playable as training takes atleast 1hour minimum for higher level troops”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-10-02
Pay to progress
“horrible game with even worse gambling mechanics matchmaking does not exist ill be level 40 matching with level 75s and 80s game is bugged to hell and back half the gamemodes stop working half way through and not to mention how pay to win…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-10-02
Pay to progress
“One of the best games I have ever played. — The only two things are no one ever has enough wood, and there is not enough balancing for players like I keep getting stuck with not enough wood but to high bases that a can’t destroy to get…”
5★ · App Store · 2026-06-05

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 63.202.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown10
Lowest$0.99
Highest$99.99
Bag of Diamonds$19.99
Pile of Diamonds$4.99
Box of Diamonds$49.99
Crate of Diamonds$99.99
Handful of Diamonds$0.99
Show 5 more purchases
Pouch of Diamonds$9.99
Special Offer$4.99
Special Offer$9.99
Special Offer$49.99
Special Offer$19.99

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.