“Yes, this game is heavily p2w, but what's stopping me? besides that, I love this game, I never get bored of it and the fun keeps going. There are a variety of modes you can do, and can even participate in some events and fight other…”
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 1,022 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.
4.6 ★526,893 ratings
10M+Downloads
12+Age rating
741 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases
About this app
Love capybaras so much you want to play as one? Get ready to embark on a whimsical adventure with a bunch of furry, feathery, fantastic friends! Introducing the craziest capybara roguelike adventure RPG! Dive into the world of capybaras with "CAPYBARA GO"!
- Your journey starts and ends with the capybara! Befriend it, bond with it, deck it out with the best gear and explore the wildl! - Yes, it's a text-based roguelike adventure! Endless adventures with randomized events, conquer the challenges ahead! - Forge kindred bonds with other animal companions! Form alliances and face dangers together! - Will you take the road off the beaten path or go the chaotic capybara route? Uncover hidden secrets with your capybara companion!…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
The evidence behind this assessment
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.9.3 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.9.3, updated 2026-09-03.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.9.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.9.3, updated 2026-09-01.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
3 or more themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
From the package we downloaded and read — version 1.9.3, scanned 2026-09-18.
Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
1–2 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Multiple ad networks bundled
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 10 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager) and 6 more
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Raised by 33 distinct reviewers — 6.5% of the 504 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 504 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 24 distinct reviewers (4.8% of 504 reviews scanned)
From the store listing: Usable without an account
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
What we saw: The store privacy disclosure (6 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“I played this game 2 month after the release, sadly the devs ruined the game. A lot of players left because they shifted to P2W and prioritized it, the game is no longer enjoyable to play unlike before. Paywall is very real and you will…”
“I used to find the game incredibly fun because it maintained a fair, competitive environment for both F2P and P2W players. Unfortunately, recent updates have shifted the game into a "pay-to-progress" loop. While the latest updates were…”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 1.9.3.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.