Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 965 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.

Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game

Mattel Game Studios HK Limited

Solitaire Cards with a Twist

4.9 ★607,654 ratings
10M+Downloads
4+Age rating
539 MBApp size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game is now officially on mobile! Brought to you by the creators of UNO! and Phase 10, this classic board card game offers a fun and competitive experience designed for every card game lover.

This new take on the classic solitaire card games will get you hooked and you won't be able to stop playing! Similar to Rummy and Yahtzee, Skip-Bo™ requires players to think strategically to solve problems. With its simple rules and engaging gameplay, it has become a tycoon in the world of card and board games, enjoyed by players of all ages and skill levels.

▶ ▶ Classic for a reason!◀◀ Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game is a fan-favorite and loved by millions around the world. Now you can play the official Skip-Bo solitaire card game just the way you remember! It’s the perfect digital board game experience, offering everything from intense 2 player battles to group matches.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game screenshot 1
Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game screenshot 2
Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game screenshot 3
Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game screenshot 4
Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game screenshot 5
Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game screenshot 6
Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game screenshot 7
Skip-Bo™: Solitaire Card Game screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 1.0.86 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.0.86, updated 2026-08-26.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 1.13.1954 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.13.1954, updated 2026-08-21.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
90% or more five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 1.13.1954, scanned 2026-10-04.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
None requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 2

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact de8ebb03c16e…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 11 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange and 7 more
Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
Reported by 37 usersReported by users, not measured — nothing we can inspect could show this either wayview evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Raised by 37 distinct reviewers — 7.2% of the 517 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).

Context 1

Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.

Cheapest and priciest options are far apart
MeasuredPublished as context — deliberately not a charge · from the store listingview evidence
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
What we saw: In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 19.99 — a 20x spread across 10 items

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Aggressive ad load
“I've been playing this game daily for a long time. It's always been a favorite of mine but now it is nearly impossible to pass any level without watching ads or spending coins to get extra cards. I played 10 levels today and was only able…”
2★ · Google Play · 2026-05-28
Aggressive ad load
“Too many instructions for secondary games within the game make for a very annoying game play. Why can't you just keep it simple? after a while of playing, the ads become very long and annoying. if you don't buy anything in the game, it…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-23
Aggressive ad load
“This game was zero ads before. I paid for this game, so I have no idea why im forced to watch ads now after years of playing and having bought it. I'm unsure if it's free now, but it shouldn't put ads on those who paid for the game…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-04-16

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 1.0.86.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown10
Lowest$0.99
Highest$19.99
Skip-bo package A$1.99
Skip-bo package B$4.99
Skip-bo package C$9.99
Skip-bo package P$3.99
Skip-bo package I$2.99
Show 5 more purchases
Skip-bo package K$5.99
Skip-bo package F$13.99
Skip-bo package O$0.99
Skip-bo package D$19.99
Skip-bo package E$6.99

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.