Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.

Wonder - AI Art Generator

Image, Photo & Drawing Creator

DEEP FLOW SOFTWARE SERVICES
Multiple ad networks — Code from multiple ad networksAggressive ads — Aggressive ad loadDeletion (dev says) — Developer says you can request data deletion
App Store rating4.3★65.4K ratings
Google Play rating3.3★117.3K ratings
PriceFreeListed price
Age17+Store age rating
Size156 MBiPhone download
CategoryLifestyle

At a glance

Full report

From our automated analysis, 10 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

App Store

This analysis describes version 5.1.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-09 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 5.1.6, updated 2025-09-17.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 5.2.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 5.2.1, updated 2026-06-15.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Turn words into mesmerizing digital artworks! All you need to do is enter a prompt, pick an art style - and watch Wonder bring your idea to life in seconds!

It’s super simple: Simply describe what you want Wonder to paint — such as “Life Under Sea” or “Shattered Rainbow” — pick a style (Cubist, Dali, Synthwave, Steampunk etc.), or select “no style”; and hit create!

【 BECOME AN ARTIST 】

Here are some cool things you can ask Wonder to paint for you:

- Poems

- Song lyrics

- Unique & creative word combinations such as “Haunted Cornfield” or “Flaming Ocean”

- Movie characters

- Star signs

- Monuments

and many more!

【 SHARE IT & GO VIRAL】

Once you have your completely unique, original artwork; feel free to share it with friends or hop on the latest #AIPainting trend on social media.

【 EXPLORE NEW STYLES 】…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

3 published · 2 shown, not confirmed

Things to watch for 2

Findings that met the published evidence standard.

Multiple ad networks bundled

Measured

Bundles 11 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AdColony, Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Chartboost and 7 more

Sources
SDKs in the app package
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package
Definition

The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.

Package artefact

sha256:0eb01af17afbe15713f5aa0b433bac374ed458b9769462a19111d691e90a6a87

Aggressive ad load

2 independent sources agree

Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch a video to earn a reward!"

Sources
User reviews and the app's own on-screen text
Agreement
2 independent kinds of source agree.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package. From App Store and Google Play reviews
Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

Package artefact

sha256:0eb01af17afbe15713f5aa0b433bac374ed458b9769462a19111d691e90a6a87

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Tracking and data collection concerns

One source only

Ships session-recording SDK (Smartlook) that can replay on-screen activity

Sources
SDKs in the app package
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.

Package artefact

sha256:0eb01af17afbe15713f5aa0b433bac374ed458b9769462a19111d691e90a6a87

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

One source only

Misleading advertising: raised by 19 distinct reviewers (3.7% of 511 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From App Store reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.

Open evidence

What reviewers report

925 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

925 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Published finding

They have changed it to where it is completely unusable, unless you're buying their subscription. It makes you watch an ad, that you cannot close out of, to create anything. the Wonder banner at the top of the screen is in the way of the…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-06-03

—⭐way too many photo creating restrictions and word restrictions. theres restrictions on words that arent even bad or nsfw, these words prevent me from creating the pics I want to create. —⭐I have a new phone and the restore is not…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-08-24

Used to be good, I used this a lot... now it's unusable. Full screen ad NEVER closes.

1★ · Google Play · 2025-10-09

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

Shown, not confirmed

False advertising. The rating is M17+ for "nudity", but there is 0 zero nudity allowed when generating images. Why say nudity when nudity isn't allowed...??

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-03

I bought the pro version a long time ago. the lifetime one. now they changed it so I have tokens and a set amount of generation. Bait and switch with no refund

1★ · Google Play · 2026-02-21

Lifetime membership SCAM — Reported to Apple. The "lifetime membership".... No such thing. Do Not Purchase. Bait and switch scam whereby they show you a "lifetime membership". There is no way to see your actual subscription. No way to see…

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-23

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

8 measured · 0 not assessed

Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

Android package 5.2.1, scanned 10 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.

Sensitive permissions
3–5 requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 10 Oct 2026

App Store

This analysis describes version 5.1.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-09 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 5.1.6, updated 2025-09-17.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 5.2.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 5.2.1, updated 2026-06-15.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 5.1.6 · 2025-09-17
Hi there! Wonder team is sending you the best wishes and lots of love! This version includes bug fixes and performance improvements. Hope you like the Wonder App! Let us know what you think by leaving a review on App Store.

Google Play

Version 5.2.1 · 2026-06-15

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
wonder-apple-1621278575
Assessment date
10 Oct 2026
Sources used
6 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
925
Package examined
Android · 5.2.1 · scanned 10 Oct 2026
Measurement vocabulary
1.4
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-10 from 925 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-10 Version analyzed: 5.1.6 (App Store), 5.2.1 (Google Play)6 independent signals925 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

App Store · Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.31 ★ · 65,351 ratings
Version
5.1.6
Updated
17 Sep 2025
Price
Free
Age rating
17+
Size
156 MB
Open in App Store

Google Play

Store rating
3.26 ★ · 117,257 ratings
Version
5.2.1
Updated
15 Jun 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
17+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
DEEP FLOW SOFTWARE SERVICES
Category
Lifestyle
Listing price
Free

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.