“1. POOR PACK LUCK-70% USELESS PULLS 2. H2H LAG, HACKERS & OPTIMIZATION ISSUES-Lag, disconnections, cheaters and poor optimization ruin the real experience. 3. MASSIVE F2P vs P2W IMBALANCE-Huge OVR teams dominate.1 OVR advantage = match…”
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 4,342 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-06.
4.6 ★25,732,449 ratings
500M+Downloads
4+Age rating
249 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases
About this app
This game includes optional in-game purchases of virtual currency that can be used to acquire virtual in-game items, including a random selection of virtual in-game items.
Play EA SPORTS FC™ Mobile Soccer 27, the ultimate online soccer game on mobile. EA SPORTS FC™ Mobile 27 Update has arrived. Celebrate the 2026/2027 season of soccer / football, in an update inspired by the World's Game. Play a Quick Match as any team from the Premier League, MLS or LALIGA EA SPORTS including Liverpool & Real Madrid. Choose a national team including Portugal, Spain, USA, Brazil, England etc & compete to become champions. Build your dream Football Ultimate Team™ with soccer stars Kylian Mbappé, Jude Bellingham, Pedri or legendary ICONs like David Beckham, Ronaldinho, Zinedine Zidane & Zlatan Ibrahimović.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
The evidence behind this assessment
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
App Store
This analysis describes version 28.0.01 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 28.0.01, updated 2026-09-24.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 28.0.01 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 28.0.01, updated 2026-09-18.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
From the package we downloaded and read — version 28.0.01, scanned 2026-09-29.
Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
None requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Multiple ad networks bundled
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Raised by 89 distinct reviewers — 4.4% of the 2,001 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“Good gameplay but horrendous p2w system. compensation not enough. shld have better match makings as other teams are jus too p2w. please fix ur game ea. it's getting worse. even now the anniversary bots match is sooo unfair. 100 rated team…”
“pay to win game”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 28.0.01.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.