Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 2,534 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-06.

Golf Clash - Golfing Simulator

Electronic Arts

A Fun Style Golf Battle Game

4.4 ★4,293,292 ratings
10M+Downloads
12+Age rating
342 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

This game includes optional in-game purchases of virtual currency that can be used to acquire virtual in-game items, including a random selection of virtual in-game items.

The BAFTA-winning golf game is better than ever, and it's free to download! Step into the ultimate golf simulation and master your golfing skills in thrilling golf games. Golf with friends, challenge rivals in 1v1, or enjoy solo play – our golf game offers an extraordinary sports experience!

Dive Into the Ultimate Online Multiplayer Golf Game & Simulator • Live your golf dreams! Choose your club, select your golf ball, and battle against golf rivals from around the globe on beautiful golf courses. • Engage in exciting 9-hole or full 18-hole matches, aiming for those satisfying birdies and even a hole-in-one. • Master our revolutionary golf shot mechanic — easy to learn, thrilling to master.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Golf Clash - Golfing Simulator screenshot 1
Golf Clash - Golfing Simulator screenshot 2
Golf Clash - Golfing Simulator screenshot 3
Golf Clash - Golfing Simulator screenshot 4
Golf Clash - Golfing Simulator screenshot 5
Golf Clash - Golfing Simulator screenshot 6
Golf Clash - Golfing Simulator screenshot 7
Golf Clash - Golfing Simulator screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 3.4.9 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.4.9, updated 2026-09-11.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 3.4.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.4.9, updated 2026-09-10.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
3 or more themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 3.4.9, scanned 2026-09-27.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
1–2 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 2

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact 83a2db11d611…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Reported by 70 usersReported by users, not measured — nothing we can inspect could show this either wayview evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Raised by 70 distinct reviewers — 3.5% of the 2,004 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 16 distinct reviewers (0.8% of 2004 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Declining an upgrade is written as a loss ('No thanks, I don't want to improve'), or users report being repeatedly pushed to subscribe during normal use.
What we saw: Constant upsell pressure: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (0.2% of 2004 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Pay to progress
“If you aren't willing to shell out a bunch of money, you won't be able to compete with those that do. It's a pay to win game. On gameplay, the shot clock is too long. It could be cut in half easily. It makes pvp games longer than needed…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-06
Pay to progress
“What a great game that this could be. Too bad its pay to win”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-18
Pay to progress
“pay to win like most apps”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-17

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 3.4.9.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.